Fiverr: it’s bad, guys — it’s bad (2024)

Despite what we all know about bidding sites, Fiverr has outdone itself in building an unethical platform that punishes designers and customers.

Fiverr: it’s bad, guys — it’s bad (3)

In 2019, it was estimated that Fiverr is worth almost $1 billion dollars. Impressive for a gig platform ostensibly offering services for as little as five dollars, no? But look just beneath the surface and one finds that Fiverr, like most multi-million dollar enterprises, is a platform built upon the exploitation of those it claims to serve — low-quality output, high fees (Fiverr take 20% of a seller’s revenue), and a lack of oversight combine to create a platform guilty of every misdemeanour found on other bidding sites. Now in 2020, Fiverr is embracing its reputation with the launch of its “Obviously Fiverr” marketing campaign and a new logo maker that actively encourages its “logo designers” to work for free.

Like most self-respecting designers, I know that bidding sites aren’t worth it. They are refuges for the under-qualified and technicians masquerading as professionals. At best, they represent a frustrating front-page of the design industry that cheap clients seek to take advantage of. At worst, they’re unethical platforms that exploit their users. But in need of quick cash at the end of 2019, I decided to experiment…

Fiverr: it’s bad, guys — it’s bad (2024)
Top Articles
Latest Posts
Article information

Author: Eusebia Nader

Last Updated:

Views: 6097

Rating: 5 / 5 (60 voted)

Reviews: 83% of readers found this page helpful

Author information

Name: Eusebia Nader

Birthday: 1994-11-11

Address: Apt. 721 977 Ebert Meadows, Jereville, GA 73618-6603

Phone: +2316203969400

Job: International Farming Consultant

Hobby: Reading, Photography, Shooting, Singing, Magic, Kayaking, Mushroom hunting

Introduction: My name is Eusebia Nader, I am a encouraging, brainy, lively, nice, famous, healthy, clever person who loves writing and wants to share my knowledge and understanding with you.